Best Headless CMS for Blogs in 2026

There is no single "best" headless CMS for every blog. The right platform depends on your team size, governance requirements, SEO maturity, and engineering stack. Here are scenario-based picks:

Top 5 Headless CMS for Blog

storyblok

Storyblok

1st place

The Headless CMS with a Visual Editor

GraphQL
4000Stars
DBs
NextjsLang
Best For

Marketing teams • Component-based sites • Multi-language sites

contentful

Contentful

2nd place

The platform for your digital-first business

GraphQL
1300Stars
1DBs
Lang
Best For

Enterprise websites • Multi-channel content • Global brands

sanity1

Sanity

3rd place

The Composable Content Cloud

Free TierGraphQL
6Stars
1DBs
NextjsLang
Best For

Marketing websites • E-commerce • Documentation

strapi

Strapi

4th place

Design APIs fast, manage content easily

Free TierSelf-hostedGraphQL
71.1Stars
4DBs
ReactLang
Best For

Content websites • Blogs • E-commerce backends

payload

Payload CMS

5th place

Developer-First, TypeScript-Native Headless CMS

Free TierSelf-hostedGraphQL
40.2Stars
2DBs
ReactLang
Best For

Next.js projects • TypeScript developers • Enterprise applications

There is no single "best" headless CMS for every blog. The right platform depends on your team size, governance requirements, SEO maturity, and engineering stack. Here are scenario-based picks:

Scenario

Top Pick

Key Strength

Key Constraint

Multi-author editorial workflows

Storyblok

Visual editor + workflow stages + custom roles on Growth plan

Workflow stages and approvals require Growth ($99/mo) or higher

SEO-first publishing at scale

Contentful

Structured metadata governance, environments, scheduled publishing

Entry at $300/mo (Lite); enterprise plans start ~$60K/yr

Developer velocity (fast setup)

Sanity

Real-time collaboration, GROQ queries, instant previews in Studio

Scheduling and content releases require Growth plan ($15/seat/mo); API costs can spike

Enterprise governance (RBAC / approvals / auditability)

Contentful or Strapi Enterprise

Contentful: granular roles on Lite+; Strapi EE: review workflows with stage-level RBAC

Contentful: seat-based pricing climbs fast; Strapi EE: self-hosted ops burden

Open-source / self-hosted (control + portability)

Payload CMS

Installs into Next.js, unlimited roles in free tier, full data ownership

Next.js-only; publishing workflows are an enterprise add-on; smaller ecosystem

Use this matrix as a starting point. The sections below provide the evidence behind each recommendation.

What a "Blog CMS" Must Do in 2026 (Beyond Writing Posts)

Running a blog on a headless CMS in 2026 means far more than storing markdown and hitting "Publish." Technical managers evaluating platforms should verify that a CMS covers all of the following requirements before shortlisting.

Multi-Author Roles and Permissions

A blog with three or more contributors needs at minimum three role tiers: author (create and edit own drafts), editor (edit any post, approve content), and publisher (push to production, manage scheduling). Look for field-level permissions so that an author can write body copy but cannot modify the canonical URL or publication date. Platforms like Strapi v5 and Payload CMS offer granular, code-defined RBAC even in their free/community editions. Contentful restricts custom roles to its Lite plan ($300/mo) and above . Storyblok includes custom roles from its Growth plan at $99/mo.

Editorial Workflow — Drafts, Approvals, Scheduled Publishing

Every blog post should pass through at least a draft → review → scheduled → published pipeline. Verify whether your CMS supports multi-stage workflows or just a binary draft/published toggle. Strapi Enterprise offers review workflows with stage-level RBAC and assignees. Sanity's content releases and scheduling are available on the Growth plan ($15/seat/mo). Storyblok provides workflow stages (draft, review, approved, published) with pipeline-based staging on Growth and above.

Scheduled publishing is critical for teams coordinating launches across time zones. Confirm that the CMS can queue a post and publish it automatically at a set UTC time without manual intervention.

Previews That Match Production

Headless architectures decouple the editor from the frontend, so preview fidelity requires deliberate setup. The gold standard is a staging environment that renders the same Next.js/Nuxt/Astro frontend with draft content injected via a preview token or draft API. Storyblok's visual editor renders a live preview inside the CMS itself, which is unique among headless platforms. Contentful supports preview environments with its Preview API and separate space environments. Sanity enables real-time preview through its Presentation tool and embedded Studio previews. Payload CMS ships a draft preview mechanism built into its Next.js integration.

If your CMS only offers a JSON preview of the content model, your editors will struggle to catch layout bugs, broken images, and SEO issues before go-live.

SEO Governance — Metadata, Canonicals, Redirects, Sitemaps

Blog SEO in 2026 depends on structured, enforced metadata. Your CMS content model should include required fields for: title tag, meta description, Open Graph image, canonical URL, and robots directives. Redirects management is equally important — particularly during migrations or URL restructures. Some platforms (Storyblok, Contentful) let you store redirects as content entries. Others (Payload, Strapi) require you to manage redirects at the application or hosting layer (Vercel, Netlify, Cloudflare). For a deeper look at this topic, see our headless CMS SEO best practices guide.

Sitemap and RSS feed generation typically happens at the frontend build step (via Next.js plugins, Astro integrations, or custom scripts), not inside the CMS itself.

Blogs need categories, tags, and optionally series/collections. These should be modeled as separate content types or taxonomies with relations, not free-text fields, so that tag pages and filtered archives work reliably. Internal linking support — the ability to link to other CMS entries by reference rather than hardcoded URL — prevents broken links when slugs change. Contentful's rich-text field supports entry hyperlinks. Sanity's Portable Text can embed internal references. Storyblok's rich-text editor supports internal story links.

Content Governance and Validation

Required fields, character limits on meta descriptions, image alt-text enforcement, and slug format validation prevent SEO regressions before content reaches production. Most headless CMS platforms support field-level validation rules. Payload CMS and Strapi allow code-defined validation with custom logic. Contentful and Storyblok provide UI-based required-field and regex validation.

Performance and Freshness — SSG / SSR / ISR

Blog content suits static generation (SSG) for speed and cost, with incremental static regeneration (ISR) or on-demand revalidation for freshness. The CMS should support webhook-based build triggers so that publishing a post automatically kicks off a rebuild on Vercel, Netlify, or your CI pipeline. All major headless CMS platforms support webhooks. Confirm that your chosen plan does not throttle webhook delivery. To understand what RBAC, ISR, and preview environments mean in practice, see our glossary.

Migrations and URL Stability

Migrating from WordPress or another legacy blog is the most common path to headless. The CMS must support bulk content import (via API or CLI), and you need a redirect strategy that preserves every indexed URL. More on this in the Migration Playbook section below.

Evaluation Scorecard (Blog Edition)

The following scorecard weighs criteria by their impact on a blog's editorial operations and long-term SEO health. Weights reflect the priorities of a technical manager running a multi-author blog.

Criterion

Weight

What to Verify

Editor UX (writing ergonomics, collaboration, comments)

15%

Rich-text quality, inline comments, real-time co-editing

Workflow maturity (approvals, scheduling, content locking)

15%

Multi-stage workflows, scheduled publishing, entry locking

RBAC and governance (granularity, audit logs)

12%

Role count, field-level perms, audit trail availability

Preview + environments (draft vs. production fidelity)

12%

Visual preview, staging environments, draft API

SEO readiness (metadata governance, redirects, integrations)

12%

Required metadata fields, redirect management, sitemap support

Content modeling for blogs (authors, series, evergreen)

10%

Relations, taxonomy modeling, versioning for updates

API & extensibility (webhooks, build triggers, SDKs)

8%

REST/GraphQL, webhook reliability, SDK quality

Localization

5%

Locale support, translation workflows (if needed)

Portability / export & lock-in risk

5%

Data export format, API-based extraction, open-source option

Ops / TCO (SaaS vs. self-hosted, seat pricing)

6%

Per-seat cost at 10+ editors, environment costs, overage fees

Workflow maturity and editor UX receive the highest weights because blog publishing is fundamentally a team coordination problem. A CMS with excellent APIs but poor editorial tooling will slow your content team and introduce SEO errors.

Shortlist — Best Headless CMS for Blog Publishing (2026)

Below are ten platforms that work well for blog use cases. For each, we note strengths, constraints, and the scenario where it fits best. You can also compare headless CMS platforms side by side on our comparison page.

Storyblok

Overview: A visual-editor-first headless CMS with built-in workflow stages, real-time preview, and component-based content modeling.

Best-fit scenario: Scale-up and mid-market teams that need editors to work visually while developers retain component-level control. A strong pick for the best headless cms for multi-author blogs thanks to its built-in workflow stages and approval pipelines.

Editor strengths: The visual editor is Storyblok's standout — editors see a live preview in-CMS while editing, without needing a separate staging environment. Workflow stages (draft → in review → approved → published) are available on Growth and above. Comments and tasks support editorial coordination.

Engineering notes: REST and GraphQL Management APIs. Webhooks for build triggers. SDKs for Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, SvelteKit, and more. Content staging pipelines available on Growth+.

Constraints: The Starter (free) plan includes 1 seat and limited features. Growth starts at $99/mo with 5 seats. Custom roles and workflow stages are not available on Starter. Traffic-based pricing can increase costs for high-traffic blogs.

When NOT to choose it: If your team prefers a code-first, schema-as-config approach (Sanity/Payload are better fits). If you need a free tier with robust multi-user support.

Contentful

Overview: An enterprise-grade composable content platform with structured content modeling, environments, and a large integration ecosystem.

Best-fit scenario: Enterprise and large scale-up teams that need strict metadata governance, environment-based staging, and predictable SaaS operations. Strong for SEO-first publishing at scale.

Editor strengths: Scheduled publishing, content tasks and comments, live collaboration on Lite+. The editor UI is functional but less visual than Storyblok. Rich-text supports embedded entries and assets.

Engineering notes: REST and GraphQL APIs. Preview API for draft content. Environments for staging/production separation. Extensive app marketplace and SDKs.

Constraints: Free plan: 10 users, 2 roles, limited API calls. Lite starts at $300/mo for 20 users and 3 roles. Premium plans start around $60K/yr with custom negotiations. Seat-based pricing becomes significant for large editorial teams. Space and environment add-ons carry separate costs.

When NOT to choose it: If your blog team is small (under 5 people) and budget-constrained. If you prefer open-source or self-hosted.

Sanity

Overview: A highly customizable headless CMS with real-time collaboration, a React-based Studio, and GROQ query language. Open-source Studio, cloud-hosted Content Lake.

Best-fit scenario: Developer-led teams that want maximum content modeling flexibility and real-time editing. Excellent for fast iteration.

Editor strengths: Real-time multi-user editing (Google Docs-style). Portable Text for rich content. Customizable Studio UI built in React. Content releases for bundling changes (Growth plan). Presentation tool for live previews.

Engineering notes: GROQ and GraphQL APIs. CDN-cached and uncached API endpoints with different cost profiles. Webhooks. Extensive plugin ecosystem.

Constraints: Free: 20 seats but no scheduling, no content releases. Growth: $15/seat/mo adds scheduling, releases, comments, AI assist. API usage costs can spike — CDN requests have a 60-second TTL, uncached requests cost more. Seats above 50 may require Enterprise.

When NOT to choose it: If your editorial team is non-technical and wants a visual editor out of the box. If you need strict cost predictability — API-based pricing requires monitoring.

Strapi

Overview: The leading open-source headless CMS. Self-hostable with an optional cloud offering. Node.js-based with both REST and GraphQL APIs.

Best-fit scenario: Teams that require full data ownership, self-hosting, and code-level control over workflows. Strong for dev-focused blogs with compliance requirements.

Editor strengths: Draft & Publish built-in. Content History tracks changes. The admin panel is clean and functional. Community Edition includes RBAC with custom roles (since v4.8). Enterprise Edition adds review workflows with stage-level RBAC and assignees.

Engineering notes: REST and GraphQL APIs out of the box. Webhooks. Dynamic zones for flexible page sections. Strapi v5 adds conditional fields, improved TypeScript support, and reworked Draft & Publish.

Constraints: Community Edition is free to self-host but lacks review workflows, SSO, and audit logs. Cloud plans: Pro at $99/mo (5 seats), Team at $499/mo (10 seats). Enterprise (self-hosted): custom pricing for SSO, audit logs, review workflows. Self-hosting requires infrastructure management — Docker, backups, security patching.

When NOT to choose it: If your team cannot manage self-hosted infrastructure or doesn't want to pay for Strapi Cloud. If you need a visual editor.

Payload CMS

Overview: An open-source, TypeScript-native CMS that installs directly into a Next.js application. No SaaS dependency — you own and host everything.

Best-fit scenario: Developer-first teams building on Next.js who want a CMS embedded in their application with zero vendor lock-in. The strongest open-source option for control and portability.

Editor strengths: Clean admin UI with customizable dashboard. Lexical-based rich-text editor. Draft/publish workflow. Visual editor available. Field-level and collection-level RBAC with unlimited roles in the free tier.

Engineering notes: REST and GraphQL APIs auto-generated from config. Built-in jobs queue for background tasks. Supports MongoDB and Postgres. Deploys to Vercel, Netlify, AWS Lambda, or traditional servers. SSO, publishing workflows, and A/B testing are enterprise features.

Constraints: Tightly coupled to Next.js — not a good fit for Nuxt, Astro, or other frameworks as the CMS backend. Publishing workflows (multi-stage approvals) and SSO require an enterprise license. Ecosystem is growing but smaller than Contentful or Strapi. Requires self-hosting.

When NOT to choose it: If your stack is not Next.js-based. If your editorial team needs a visual, drag-and-drop editing experience comparable to Storyblok. If you want managed SaaS with zero ops.

Hygraph

Overview: A GraphQL-native headless CMS with content federation capabilities, allowing you to pull data from external APIs into a unified GraphQL schema.

Best-fit scenario: Teams managing content across multiple sources (PIM, DAM, commerce) that need a unified API. Good for blogs that are part of a larger content ecosystem.

Editor strengths: UI-based schema builder. Webhooks, localization, and asset management built in. Scheduling available on paid plans. AI-powered content features.

Engineering notes: GraphQL-only (no REST API). Content federation is unique — pull product data, user profiles, etc. into the same query as blog content. MCP server available for AI agent integration.

Constraints: Free plan: 3 seats, limited API calls. Professional plan starts at $199/mo. GraphQL-only may require more onboarding for teams unfamiliar with it. Blog-specific features (workflow stages, visual preview) are less mature than Storyblok or Contentful.

When NOT to choose it: If you just need a blog CMS and don't need content federation. If your team is not comfortable with GraphQL.

DatoCMS

Overview: A SaaS headless CMS with strong GraphQL delivery, built-in CDN, image pipeline, and polished editor experience. Known for performance and localization.

Best-fit scenario: Small-to-mid-sized teams that want a clean editing experience with fast global delivery and strong image optimization. Well-suited for image-heavy blogs.

Editor strengths: Clean, intuitive editing UI. Structured text (similar to Sanity's Portable Text). Built-in image optimization pipeline with automatic responsive variants. Real-time previews with web preview configuration.

Engineering notes: GraphQL API for delivery (no GraphQL mutations — content management is via REST). Built-in CDN. Webhooks and build triggers. Good framework support for Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, Gatsby.

Constraints: GraphQL for reads only; mutations require REST. Lacks deep custom roles compared to Contentful or Strapi — limited RBAC granularity. No batch editing through UI. Cannot choose data center location. Professional plan starts around $99/mo.

When NOT to choose it: If you need enterprise-grade RBAC or complex multi-stage workflows. If you require GraphQL mutations. If you need to choose your data center region for compliance.

Prismic

Overview: A headless CMS centered around "Slices" — reusable content components that editors can assemble into pages. Strong visual page-building workflow.

Best-fit scenario: Marketing teams that build content-heavy landing pages and blogs with modular, component-based layouts. Good for agencies managing multiple client blogs.

Editor strengths: Slice Machine enables developers to create reusable components; editors assemble pages from them. Visual page builder experience. Scheduling available on paid plans.

Engineering notes: REST and GraphQL APIs. Framework-specific integrations for Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit. Slice Machine runs as a local dev tool for component development.

Constraints: Free plan: 1 user, generous document limits. Small plan: $10/mo for 3 users. Medium: $150/mo for 25 users. API is more opinionated than competitors — less query flexibility. Audit logs and custom roles reserved for enterprise (Platinum at $675/mo or custom).

When NOT to choose it: If you need highly flexible content queries or complex relation modeling. If you need deep RBAC on lower-tier plans.

Ghost

Overview: A publishing-focused platform purpose-built for blogs, newsletters, and memberships. Available as managed SaaS (Ghost(Pro)) or self-hosted open-source.

Best-fit scenario: Content-first teams that want a blog platform with built-in newsletters, paid memberships, and a polished writing experience — without the complexity of a general-purpose headless CMS.

Editor strengths: Ghost's editor is arguably the best pure writing experience among CMS platforms. Clean, distraction-free, Markdown-based with dynamic cards for embeds, images, and custom content. Built-in newsletter delivery, member management, and paywall support.

Engineering notes: Content API (REST, read-only) and Admin API for management. Can be used headlessly by consuming the Content API from a Next.js or Astro frontend. Webhooks available. Themes available for non-headless use.

Constraints: Not a true headless CMS — best as a standalone publishing platform. RBAC is limited to four fixed roles (Contributor, Author, Editor, Administrator) with no custom roles. No custom content modeling. No GraphQL. Self-hosting requires Node.js and MySQL infrastructure. Ghost(Pro) starts at $9/mo (Starter) but scales to $199/mo+ for larger teams.

When NOT to choose it: If you need custom content types, complex relations, or flexible content modeling. If your blog is part of a larger digital experience requiring a true headless architecture.

Directus

Overview: An open-source data platform that wraps any SQL database with an instant REST and GraphQL API plus an admin dashboard. Database-first philosophy.

Best-fit scenario: Teams with existing databases or custom data requirements that want a CMS layer on top. Good for developer-heavy teams that want full SQL control.

Editor strengths: Auto-generated admin UI based on your database schema. RBAC with granular field-level permissions. Flows engine for workflow automation (approval chains, notifications).

Engineering notes: REST and GraphQL APIs auto-generated. Supports Postgres, MySQL, SQLite, MS SQL, and more. Webhooks and automation via Flows. Self-hosted or Directus Cloud.

Constraints: The editing UI is functional but less polished for content-heavy workflows compared to purpose-built CMS platforms. No visual editor. Requires database design skills. Cloud pricing starts around $99/mo.

When NOT to choose it: If your editorial team expects a polished, content-focused editing experience. If you don't want to manage database schema directly.

Comparison Table

Platform

Workflow / Scheduling

RBAC Maturity

Preview Quality

SEO Governance Readiness

Typical Stack Fit

Key Drawback

Storyblok

Workflow stages + scheduling (Growth+)

Custom roles (Growth+)

★★★★★ In-CMS visual editor

Good (metadata fields, redirects via content)

Next.js, Nuxt, Astro

Pricing scales with traffic

Contentful

Scheduled publishing + tasks (Lite+)

Granular roles (Lite+, custom on Premium)

★★★★ Preview API + environments

Strong (structured metadata, env separation)

Next.js, Nuxt, Gatsby

Expensive at scale ($300/mo entry)

Sanity

Content releases + scheduling (Growth)

Custom roles (Growth+)

★★★★ Presentation tool, Studio embed

Good (custom metadata fields, Portable Text)

Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, Remix

API cost unpredictability

Strapi

Review workflows (Enterprise)

Custom roles (Community), stage RBAC (EE)

★★★ Draft API (custom preview setup)

Good (custom fields, plugin ecosystem)

Next.js, Nuxt, Astro

Self-hosting ops burden

Payload

Draft/publish (free), workflows (Enterprise)

Unlimited roles, field-level (free)

★★★★ Built-in draft preview (Next.js)

Good (custom validation, code-defined)

Next.js only

Next.js-only, smaller ecosystem

Hygraph

Scheduling (paid)

Custom roles (paid)

★★★ Web preview config

Moderate (metadata via schema)

Any (GraphQL)

GraphQL-only, higher entry price

DatoCMS

Scheduling (paid)

Basic roles

★★★★ Web preview, image pipeline

Good (built-in SEO fields, CDN)

Next.js, Nuxt, Astro, Gatsby

Limited RBAC depth

Prismic

Scheduling (paid)

Limited (enterprise for custom)

★★★★ Slice-based preview

Moderate (custom fields)

Next.js, Nuxt, SvelteKit

Opinionated API, limited RBAC on lower tiers

Ghost

Scheduling (all plans)

Fixed 4 roles only

★★★★★ Built-in (non-headless)

Good (built-in SEO, sitemaps)

Standalone or headless via API

Not a true headless CMS, no custom content models

Directus

Flows-based automation

Granular, field-level

★★★ Custom setup required

Moderate (schema-dependent)

Any (REST/GraphQL)

Less polished editor UX

For a detailed feature-by-feature breakdown, compare headless CMS platforms side by side using our comparison tool. For cost planning, see our headless CMS pricing breakdown.

Reference Architecture (Blog on Headless)

Here is a pragmatic blueprint for running a blog on headless infrastructure. This architecture works with any CMS from the shortlist above and any modern frontend framework. For framework-specific guidance, see our hub on building a blog with Next.js, Nuxt, or Astro.

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ HEADLESS CMS │
│ (Source of truth: posts, authors, tags, metadata) │
│ │
│ Editor writes → Draft → Review → Approve → Publish │
│ │
│ On publish: fires webhook ──────────────────────┐ │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────┼──────┘


┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ BUILD / DEPLOY │
│ │
│ Webhook → CI/CD (Vercel / Netlify / GitHub Actions) │
│ → Incremental build (ISR or on-demand) │
│ → Deploy to CDN edge │
│ │
│ Full rebuild: nightly or on schema changes │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│ │
▼ ▼
┌─────────────────┐ ┌────────────────────────┐
│ PRODUCTION │ │ PREVIEW / STAGING │
│ SSG/ISR pages │ │ Draft API + token │
│ Public CDN │ │ Same frontend, draft │
│ Sitemap.xml │ │ content injected │
│ RSS feed │ │ Password-protected │
│ robots.txt │ │ or token-gated │
└─────────────────┘ └────────────────────────┘


┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ SUPPORTING SERVICES │
│ │
│ • Redirects: managed at edge (Vercel/Netlify config │
│ or middleware) — tested in CI before deploy │
│ • Analytics: Plausible, Fathom, or GA4 │
│ • Search: Algolia or Pagefind (static) │
│ • Experimentation: Vercel Edge Config, LaunchDarkly │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Webhook-Triggered Rebuilds and Incremental Builds

Configure your CMS to fire a webhook to your hosting platform whenever a post is published, updated, or unpublished. For Next.js with ISR, use on-demand revalidation endpoints. For Astro or fully static builds, trigger a full rebuild — or use Astro's Content Layer with incremental support. Keep full rebuilds under 60 seconds by using ISR for individual pages and reserving full builds for sitemap or navigation changes.

Preview System

Set up a preview route on your frontend that accepts a draft token (or preview secret) and fetches unpublished content from the CMS's draft/preview API. Protect the preview URL with HTTP Basic Auth, a shared secret, or your CMS's built-in access controls. Test preview in CI to ensure it doesn't leak to production.

Sitemap, RSS, and Redirects

Generate sitemap.xml and rss.xml at build time from CMS content. For Next.js, use next-sitemap. For Astro, use the built-in @astrojs/sitemap integration. Redirects should live in version control (e.g., vercel.json, _redirects) and be tested as part of your CI pipeline — never rely solely on CMS-stored redirects without validation.

Multi-Author Workflow Patterns (That Don't Break SEO)

Roles and Permission Layers

Define three core roles:

  • Author: Can create and edit their own posts. Cannot publish. Cannot modify SEO metadata fields (canonical, robots, slug) without editor approval.
  • Editor: Can edit any post. Can approve and move content to "ready for publish." Can modify all metadata fields. Cannot push to production on enterprise-tier setups.
  • Publisher: Can publish and schedule. Can manage redirects and taxonomy. Responsible for final SEO QA.

Most CMS platforms support this pattern. Payload and Strapi let you define it in code. Contentful, Storyblok, and Sanity configure it through the admin UI.

Approval Gates and Scheduled Publishing

Set up a gate between "editor approved" and "published" so that no post goes live without metadata review. Use scheduled publishing to batch releases — for example, publishing every Tuesday and Thursday morning. This creates a predictable crawl pattern for search engines and a reliable cadence for your audience.

Content QA Checklist

Before any post moves to "approved," verify:

  • Title tag ≤ 60 characters and includes target keyword
  • Meta description ≤ 155 characters
  • Canonical URL is set (self-referencing or cross-domain)
  • Open Graph image is uploaded and meets dimension requirements
  • All internal links resolve (no broken references)
  • All images have alt text
  • Slug follows your URL convention (e.g., /blog/your-post-slug)
  • Author profile is linked (not free-text)
  • At least one category/tag is assigned

Automate as much of this as possible with CMS validation rules and required fields.

Evergreen Updates vs. New Posts

When updating existing content, preserve the original URL and publication date. Update the lastmod date in your sitemap. Do not create a new URL for an updated post — this splits link equity and confuses search engines. If the CMS creates a new version or entry for updates, ensure your frontend resolves to the same URL.

Migration Playbook (WordPress / Legacy Blog → Headless)

URL Inventory and Redirect Mapping

  1. Crawl your existing blog with Screaming Frog, Ahrefs, or wget --spider to capture every indexed URL.
  2. Export the URL list and map each to its new headless equivalent.
  3. For URLs that change structure (e.g., /2024/01/post-title/blog/post-title), create 301 redirects.
  4. Store redirects in version control and test them in CI before launch.
  5. Verify coverage: every URL in Google Search Console's index report should either resolve or redirect.

Content Model Mapping

Map WordPress concepts to headless equivalents:

WordPress

Headless CMS

Post

Blog Post (collection type)

Category

Category (taxonomy type or relation)

Tag

Tag (taxonomy type or relation)

Author (user)

Author (dedicated content type with bio, image, social links)

Featured Image

Media asset linked to post

Custom Fields (ACF/Meta)

Structured fields on the content model

Yoast SEO fields

SEO metadata fields (title, description, canonical, OG image)

Structured Data Parity

Audit your existing blog's Schema.org markup (Article, BlogPosting, BreadcrumbList, FAQPage). Rebuild equivalent structured data in your new frontend. Test with Google's Rich Results Test before launch. Losing structured data during migration can drop rich snippet visibility.

Launch Monitoring Checklist

FAQ